2015 LCC Conference

 CALENDAR 

“Whew! Heavy rains poured just when I got off the taxi back home from the meeting of the Literacy Coordinating Council at the DILG-NAPOLCOM building.

The DILG is co-chair of LCC. The chair is DepEd, represented by Usec Dina Ocampo, who announced that it was her last meeting as LCC chair, since UP has asked her to return from her 4-year secondment to DepEd.

It was an Ave atque Vale meeting, since we also welcomed the incoming chief of the LCC secretariat, Enrico Mendoza…”

– Edicio Dela Torre 06/27/2017

DayTimeActivitySpeakers/In-ChargeSession Chair/ModeratorRapporteur
Day 17:00 am – 10:00 amRegistration of ParticipantsLCC Secretariat  
Sept. 30, 2015     
Wednesday10:00 – 10:30Coffee Break   
 
 10:30 – 12:00Opening Program Ms. Anna Liza F. BonaguaMs. Aurea Jean A. Abad
    DirectorFreelance Writer and
  Entrance of ColorsC/o Department ofBureau of Local GovernmentEditorial Consultant
  National AnthemEducation (DepEd)Development (BLGD) 
  Interfaith PrayerCebu CityDepartment of the Interior 
    and Local Government (DILG) 
  Welcome MessageHon. Michael L. Rama  
   Mayor, Cebu City  
 
  Opening RemarksDr. Dina S. Ocampo  
  RationaleUndersecretary DepEd  
  Conference OrientationChairperson, LCC  
  and Introduction of   
  Participants   
 
  Introduction of KeynoteMs. Ma. Josefina R. Ricafort  
  SpeakerCommittee Secretary  
   Committee on Basic  
   Education, Culture and Arts  
   House of Representatives  
 
  Keynote AddressDr. Malcom S. Garma  
   Regional Director  
   Region IX  
   DepEd, Pagadian City  
 
 12:00 – 1:30 pmLunch   
 
 1:30 – 3:00Plenary Session I: DigitalDr. Emmanuel C. LallanaMr. Addie T. UnsiMs. Junette Gonzales
  LiteracyChief ExecutiveNational CoordinatorTechnical Assistant
   Ideacorp IncorporatedEducation Network (E-Net)Office of the Undersecretary
     for Programs and Projects
   Dr. Aurelio P. Vilbar DepEd
   Associate Professor  
   University of the Philippines  
   Cebu City  
 
  Open Forum   
 
 3:00 – 3:30Coffee Break   
 
 3:30 – 500Parallel Session I: DigitalAtty. Dennis Bernard AcordaMs. Susan M. CarandangMs. Teresita D. Tetangco
  LiteracyCity AdministratorSupervising EconomicMunicipal Information Officer
   Pasay CityDevelopment Specialistand Municipal Environment
    Education and Skills Divisionand Natural Resources
    National Economic andOfficer
    Development AuthorityOffice of the Mayor
    (NEDA)Pulilan, Bulacan
 
  Parallel Session II: DigitalMr. Rodolfo de MesaDr. Emelyn Q. LibunaoMr. Zaldy I. Masangkay
  LiteracyMunicipal AdministratorStaff DirectorDivision Chief
   Balanga CityProgram ManagementPolicy Studies and
    Division (PMD)Development Division
    Philippine Information AgencyBLGD-DILG
    (PIA) 
 
  Parallel Session III: DigitalMs. Agnes B. RosalesMr. Addie UnsiMs. Junette Gonzales
  LiteracyCommunity and Social  
   Development Department  
   Manager  
    CFC Minerals Corporation 
 
Day 28:30 – 10:00 amPlenary Session II: MediaMs. Ann Lourdes C. LopezAtty. Lilia S. GarciaMr. Zaldy I. Masangkay
Oct. 1, 2015 LiteracyDirectorProfessor, PNU 
Thursday  Research and Consultancy  
   Asian Institute of Journalism  
   and Communication (AIJC)  
 
  Open Forum   
 
 10:00 – 10:30Coffee Break   
 
 10:30 – 12:00Plenary Session III: Socio-Dr. Maria Serena I. DioknoProf. Celia M. IlananMs. Marina A. Ariola
  Cultural LiteracyChairpersonProfessor and HeadAdministrator
   National HistoricalAlumni Relations and ServicesSinag Coomunity Center
   Commission of the PhilippinesPhilippine Normal UniversityNon-Government Organization
    (PNU)(NGO)
   Hon. Allan L. Rellon, DPA  
   Mayor, Tagum City  
 
  Open Forum   
 
 12:00 – 1:30 pmLunch   
 
 1:30 – 3:00Parallel Session IV: MediaDr. Ferdinand B. PitaganMs. Ma. Josefina R. RicafortMs. Marina A. Arriola
  LiteracyConsultant, DepEd and CHED  
   Founder, Activated and the  
   National Digital Educators  
   Society  
 
  Parallel Session V: Socio-Dr. Binonie P. LlantoMr. Addie T. UnsieMr. Zaldy I. Masangkay
  Cultural LiteracyPresident  
   Literacy, Anthropology and  
   Development (SULADS)  
 
  Parallel Session VI: Socio-Sr. Lourdes U. SoyaoMs. Celia M. IlananMs. Teresita D. Tetangco
  Cultural Literacyorder of the Discalced  
   Carmelitte Secular  
   Mangyan Mission  
   Calapan, Mindoro  
 
 3:00 – 3:30Coffee Break   
 
 3:30 – 5:00Presentation of Hall of FameHon. Jocell Aimee R. Vistan-  
  Award to the Municipality ofCasaje  
  Plaridel, BulacanMunicipal Mayor  
   Plaridel, Bulacan  
   Talk of Awardee  
 
  Launching of the CompendiumMs. Ma. Josefina R. Ricafort  
  of Literacy-related Laws   
 
 6:00 – 7:00Dinner   
 
 7:00 – 10:00Socials   
 
Day 38:30 – 10:00 amPlenary Session IV: FinancialMs. Ma. Lasalette M. GumbanDr. Fe A. HidalgoMs. Susan M. Carandang
Oct. 2, 2015 LiteracyYouth Program OfficerPresident 
Friday  National Confederation ofFoundation for Upgrading the 
   Cooperatives (NATCCO)Standard of Education (FUSE) 
    Incorporated 
 
   Ms. Pauline Landicho  
   Deputy Director for Resource  
   Mobilization Unit  
   Center for Agriculture and  
   Rural Development (CARD)  
   Incorporated  
 
  Open Forum   
 
 10:00 – 10:30Coffee Break   
 
 10:30 – 12:00Plenary Session V: PoliticalMr. Edicio dela TorreAtty. Lilia S. GarciaMs. Marina A. Arriola
  LiteracyPresidentProfessor 
   E-Net and Education for LifePNU 
   Foundation (ELF)  
 
   Mr. Yves Xavier C. Bugarin  
   Head, Political Affairs  
   Committee on Education  
   Arts and Culture  
   Philippine Senate  
 
  Open Forum   
 
 12:00 – 1:30 pmLunch   
 
 1:30 – 3:00Parallel Session VII: FinancialHon. Ignacio W. ZubiriDr. Fe A. HidalgoMr. Zaldy I. Masangkay
  LiteracyMayor, Malaybalay City  
 
   Dr. Ernesto Cabañero  
   Member, Board of Director  
   and Coordinator from  
   Aflatoun  
   Abra Diocesan Teachers’  
   and Employees Multi-Purpose  
   Cooperative  
 
  Parallel Session VIII: PoliticalHon. Tito S. SarionAtty. Lilia S. GarciaMs. Marina A. Arriola
  LiteracyMunicipal Mayor  
   Daet, Camarines Norte  
 
   Hon. John C. Bongat  
   Mayor, Naga City  
 
  Parallel Session IX: Socio-Mr. Rozanno E. RufinoMr. Yves Xavier C. BugarinMs. Teresita D. Tetangco
  Cultural LiteracyCoordinator  
   Indigenous Peoples Education  
   Office (IPsSEO)  
   DepEd  
 
   Ms. Arnie T. Gargaritano  
   Administrative Officer II  
   Municipality of Tubungan  
   Iloilo  
 
 3:00 – 3:30Coffee Break   
 
 3:30 – 5:00Closing Program   
 
  Challenges to LiteracyMr. Rene K. BurdeosMs. Emelyn Q. LibunaoMs. Aurea Jeane A. Abad
   Regional Director, DILG  
   Cebu City  
 
  Closing MessageDr. Juliet A. Jeruta  
   Regional Director  
   DepEd Region VII  

Master of Ceremonies: Prof. Celia M. Ilanan

Literacy Mapping Study on 5th and 6th Class Municipalities

The literacy mapping results show the thirty (30) bottom barangays in fifth and sixth class municipalities with lowest literacy rates. The literacy mapping is useful to LGUs in the formulation of policies that will push further the decentralization of literacy programs and projects. These results will also guide Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) in prioritizing the beneficiaries of their literacy projects.

30 Bottom Barangays with Lowest Literacy Rate (5th and 6th Class Municipalities) 

  1. Barangay Matampa, Salay, Misamis Oriental – 30.4%
  2. Barangay Alipuaton, Salay, Misamis Oriental – 32.9%               
  3. Barangay Bunal, Salay, Misamis Oriental – 44.8%
  4. Barangay Nanga-Nangan, Tigbao, Zamboanga del Sur – 55.2%
  5. Barangay Pandalonan, Munai, Lanao del Norte – 56.3%
  6. Barangay Cardiz, Bagulin, La Union – 64.3%
  7. Barangay Dansalan, Sapad, Lanao del Norte – 65.1%
  8. Barangay Mate, Tigbao, Zamboanga del Sur – 65.6%
  9. Barangay Dioyo, Sapang Dalaga, Misamis Occidental – 72%
  10. Barangay Bubonga Radapan, Munai, Lanao del Norte – 72.3%
  11. Barangay Cabasagan, Pantao Ragat, Lanao del Norte – 73%
  12. Barangay Donanao, Tinglayan, Kalinga – 73%
  13. Barangay Estrella, San Gillermo, Isabela – 75%
  14. Barangay Natangcopan, Pantao Ragat, Lanao del Norte –  75.6%
  15. Barangay Nanungaran, Rizal, Cagayan –  761%
  16. Barangay Progreso, San Gillermo, Isabela – 78.9%
  17. Barangay Marapilit, Zumarraga, Samar – 79.5%
  18. Barangay Dao-angan, Boliney, Abra – 80.3%
  19. Barangay Paroyhog, Sta. Maria, Romblon – 81.9%
  20. Barangay Bekigan, Sadanga, Mountain Province – 82.3%
  21. Barangay San Miguel, Maslog, Eastern Samar – 82.4%
  22. Barangay Ventura, Sapang Dalaga, Misamis Occidental – 82.4%
  23. Barangay Old Poblacion, Munai, Lanao del Norte – 82.6%
  24. Barangay Canlasog, Larena,, Siquijor – 82.9%
  25. Barangay Sto. Rosario, Bacuag, Surigao del Norte –  83.3%
  26. Barangay Poblacion I, Burgos, Surigao del Norte – 83.9%
  27. Barangay Bunacan, San Julian, Eastern Samar – 84%
  28. Barangay Bangcal, Pantar, Lanao del Norte – 85.7%
  29. Barangay Manalad, Calamba, Misamis Occidental – 86.3%
  30. Barangay Malijao, Dimiao, Bohol – 86.7%

2003 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey

The 2003 Functional Literacy, Education, and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS) is a national survey that gathers information on basic and functional literacy status of the population, their educational and skills qualifications, and exposure to mass media. The survey covered 25,697 households and 75,558 persons aged 10 to 64 years.

The 2003 FLEMMS is the third in a series of functional literacy surveys conducted by the National Statistics Office (NSO). The first two rounds were taken in 1989 and 1994, also by the NSO, which is mandated to conduct the survey every five years. The Literacy Coordinating Council (LCC) and the Department of Education (DepEd) provided assistance in the design and development of the questionnaires used in the 2003 survey.  The results of the 2008 FLEMMS is now being processed and is set to be released during the 1st quarter of 2010.

Results of 2003 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS) 10-64 Years Old by Sex, by Region, Philippines

Basic Literacy Rate – 93.4% or 57,904,712

  • Male Basic Literacy Rate – 92.6% or 28,724,520
  • Female Basic Literacy Rate – 94.3% or 29,180,192

Basic Illiteracy Rate – 6.6% or 4,059,288

  • Male Basic Illiteracy Rate – 7.4% or 2,295,480
  • Female Basic Illiteracy Rate – 5.7% or 1,763,808

Functional Literacy Rate – 84.1% or 48,424,776

  • Male Functional Literacy Rate – 81.9% or 23,707,593
  • Female Functional Literacy Rate – 86.3% or 24,717,183

Functional Illiteracy Rate – 15.9% or 9,163,224

  • Male Functional Illiteracy Rate – 18.1% or 5,239,407
  • Female Functional Illiteracy Rate – 13.7% or 3,923,817

Results of the 2008 Functional Literacy, Education, and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS)

Fifty-eight million of the estimated 67 million Filipinos 10 to 64 years old are functionally literate, according to the results of the 2008 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS). In this survey, a functionally literate person is one who can read, write and compute or one who can read, write, compute and comprehend. Persons who completed high school or a higher level of education are also considered functionally literate. 

The 2008 FLEMMS revealed a functional literacy rate of 86.4 percent; in the 2003 FLEMMS the estimate was 84.1 percent. Among the regions, NCR has the highest functional literacy rate at 94.0 percent, followed by CALABARZON (93.5 percent) and Central Luzon (92.1 percent). ARMM has the lowest functional literacy rate (71.6 percent). The functional literacy rate among females is higher than among males (88.7 percent vs. 84.2 percent). 

As expected, functional literacy rate is higher among persons with higher level of education. Among those who had reached but did not finish high school, 89.8 percent were functionally literate and of those who had finished elementary, 80.8 percent were functionally literate. By comparison, 67.0 percent of those with some elementary education were functionally literate, while only five percent among those with no formal education were functionally literate. 

The 2008 FLEMMS is the fourth in a series of functional literacy surveys conducted by the National Statistics Office. The previous rounds were conducted in 1989, 1994, and 2003. In the 2008 FLEMMS, a self-administered questionnaire was accomplished by 69,482 individuals aged 10 to 64 years in 25,505 households sampled for the survey. The survey aimed to provide information on basic and functional literacy status and exposure to mass media of the population. The 2008 FLEMMS was conducted in coordination with the Literacy Coordinating Council (LCC) and the Department of Education (DepEd). 

(Sgd.) CARMELITA N. ERICTA Administrator

Barangay Mechanism: The Barangay Implementing Unit

It is suggested that every barangay establishes a Barangay Implementing Unit (BIU) chaired by the barangay captain and co-chaired by the head or principal of the barangay elementary or high school.

If a similar mechanism exists in the barangay, it is suggested that this be used and its functions expanded to include literacy concerns. The BIU composition includes representatives from existing community-based organizations, both government and non-government. It is also suggested that one member be designated to attend to reports preparation for transmittal to higher councils for appropriate action.

Functions of the BIU
  • Research, plan, manage implementation, monitor, evaluate, mobilize and institutionalize barangay-based programs and projects;
  • Consolidate/Make a synthesis of feedback, lessons learned, and insights gained from barangay-based programs and projects, for transmittal to MIUs, PIUs, RLCC, and LCC as input to national, regional, provincial, and municipal policy and program directions and strategy formulation;
  • Generate resources, funds, and facilities for barangay-based programs and projects;
  • Manage funds for barangay-based programs and projects;
  • Plan and conduct of barangay-based advocacy and social mobilization activities, networking, and linkaging to ensure awareness, acceptance, and support by various sectors at the community level;
  • Develop a barangay database on literacy and continuing education.
Suggested activities for the BIU
  • Initiate data collection and validation and/or coordinate with/assist the Municipal Implementing Unit in data collection and validation through baseline surveys in their respective barangays and regularly update/submit accurate reports on literacy development and community profile to be utilized for policy formulation and project development;
  • Conduct orientations and fora on different mandates/policies regarding literacy development, importance of literacy to overall community development, existing and proposed literacy projects, and successful literacy projects to gain community support;
  • Mobilize/Gather target clients for information exchange, needs assessment, and consultative/participatory planning;
  • Develop project proposals and action plans responsive to the literacy and socio-economic development needs of target clients, to be done with target clients;
  • Allocate barangay fund for literacy development and/or conduct activities for fund generation, materials acquisition, and technical assistance;
  • Implement, manage, supervise, monitor, evaluate, and document projects on literacy development which were implemented on their own or reviewed, approved, or supported by either the PIU, LCC, or sponsoring agencies; and
  • Document activities on literacy and submit reports to MIU, PIU, and LCC.

Municipal Mechanism: The Municipal Implementing Unit

It is suggested that each municipality establishes a Municipal Implementing Unit (MIU) to be chaired by the Municipal Mayor and co-chaired by the district supervisor or principal of the biggest school.

The suggested MIU composition is similar to that of the PIU, with representatives from the same sectors as the LCC, RLCC, and the PIU, as follows: education, information, planning, municipal government/ legislative body and non-government sector.

It is also suggested that a Technical Working Group (TWG) be established, with members chosen from the organic personnel of the municipal government. The TWG may include the municipal planning and development officer; municipal social welfare officer; and training specialist/public employment service officer.

Again, a secretariat is recommended to be created to take charge of program support work.

However, if a similar mechanism already exists in the Municipality, it is suggested that this be used and its functions be expanded to include literacy concerns.

Functions of the MIU
  • Research, plan, manage implementation, monitor, evaluate, advocacy and social mobilization, and resource generation and institutionalization of municipality-initiated programs and projects.
  • Provide technical advice and guidance to barangays that seek assistance on planning and implementation of programs and projects at the barangay level, specifically: on research and development, project identification, proposal preparation management, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, advocacy and social mobilization, networking, and resource generation;
  • Review and assess progress of programs and projects being implemented on a municipality-wide level as well as barangay-based programs and projects;
  • Generate and make synthesis of feedback, insights, and lessons learned from municipality-based programs and projects, for transmittal to PIU, RLCC, and LCC as input to national, regional, and provincial policy directions and strategy formulation;
  • Manage funds of municipality-wide projects;
  • Generate resources, funds, and facilities  for municipal programs and projects;
  • Plan and conduct appropriate advocacy, social mobilization, networking, and linkaging to ensure awareness, acceptance, and support by various public offices and targets of the programs and projects;
  • Develop a municipal database on literacy and continuing education.
Suggested specific activities
  • In consultation with the Sangguniang Bayan, issuance of an executive order for the creation of the MIU, identifying key actors and defining their duties and functions;
  • Formulation of policies responsive to literacy and continuing education development;

Provincial Mechanism: The Provincial Implementing Unit

It is suggested that Provincial Implementing Units (PIUs) be established, with a similar composition and membership as the RLCC. Chaired by the Provincial Governor and co-chaired by the Schools Division Superintendent, membership will include representatives from the same sectors as the LCC and the RLCC, namely: education, information, provincial government planning, academe, provincial legislative/active body, and non-government organizations.

It is likewise suggested that a Technical Working Group (TWG) be created, composed of organic personnel of the provincial government, representatives from Sangguniang Panlalawigan, NGOs, GAs, volunteer groups, and other similar groups. The TWG may include the provincial planning and development officer, provincial social welfare officer, and training specialist/employment service officer.

However, if a similar mechanism exists in the Province, it is suggested that this be used and its functions expanded to include literacy concerns.

A secretariat is likewise recommended to be created to be responsible for program support work. 

Functions of the PIU
  • Research, plan, manage implementation, monitor, and evaluate literacy/continuing education programs and projects which are province-wide in scope and coverage;
  • Provide technical advice and guidance to municipality-initiated programs and projects specifically on research and development, project identification, proposal preparation, management, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, advocacy and social mobilization, networking, and resource generation;
  • Review and assess progress of programs and projects being implemented in the province;
  • Generate feedback, insights, and lessons learned from experiences of these programs and projects, for transmittal to the LCC/RLCC as input to national and regional policy direction and recommendations;
  • Generate resources, funds, and facilities for programs and projects of the province;
  • Manage funds of province-wide projects;
  • Plan and conduct appropriate advocacy, social mobilization, and networking and linkaging to ensure awareness, acceptance, and support by various public offices and target clients of the program/project; and
  • Develop provincial database on literacy and continuing education.
Specific activities of the PIU
  • Research, plan, manage implementation of and generate resources for literacy/continuing education programs and projects which are province-wide in scope and coverage.
  • In consultation with the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, issuance of an executive order for the creation of the PIU, identifying key actors, and defining their duties and functions;
  • Formulation of  policies responsive to literacy and continuing education development;
  • Identification and prioritization of capability building needs of PIU, MIU, and BIU members in collaboration with LCC;
  • Establishment and strengthening of networks and linkages with the local School Board, GOs, GAs, and NGOs to consolidate/converge plans and programs for literacy development and continuing education program;
  • Establishment and development of a Management and Information System in coordination with the Regional Literacy Coordinating Council (RLCC) to update and maintain accurate data on literacy development status and provincial profile;
  • Consolidation  and analysis reports of MIUs to be forwarded  to LCC;
  • Intensification of  information campaign/social mobilization on Eradication of Illiteracy through the technical assistance of LCC.
  • Coordination and collaboration with MIUs and BIUs to mobilize clients for ASM-IEC, needs assessment, and participatory planning;
  • Provision of technical/funding assistance to MIUs, BIUs, and target clients at various stages of approved literacy projects (development of appropriate project proposals and action plans, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and endorsement for project implementation);
  • Integration of  literacy development projects into the Provincial Development Plan specifically those proposed by MIUs and mobilizing available resources for their implementation;
  • Implementation of action plans and projects developed by the PIU or requested/ proposed by MIUs; and
  • Monitoring, documentation, and evaluation of  project activities of the PIU, MIUs, and BIUs and submission of corresponding report to the RLCC and other agencies for information, further support, and/or evaluation.

Regional Mechanism: The Regional Literacy Coordinating Council

It is suggested that every region establishes a Regional Literacy Coordinating Council (RLCC) with a composition similar to the LCC, to include representatives from the following regional offices, agencies, and sectors: Department of Education; Department of the Interior and Local Government; Philippine Information Agency; National Economic and Development Authority; education committee of the Regional Development Coordinating Council (RDCC); the academe, and non-government organizations.

The composition and membership of the RLCC may vary, depending on the sectors which may be called upon to be partners in the effort. However, if similar mechanisms exist in the region, it is suggested that these be used and their functions expanded to include literacy concerns.

Similar to the LCC, the members of the RLCC shall annually elect a chairman from among themselves. They shall likewise meet regularly and may convene special meetings to take up urgent concerns upon the call of the RLCC chairman. A regional secretariat is also suggested to be installed to handle documentation and other program support functions.

General functions of the RLCC
  • Formulate regional policies and directions responsive to the local context;
  • Review program proposals and projects being implemented by PIUs in coordination with the monitoring units of  PIUs;
  • Assist PIUs in resource (human, financial, and material) generation including identification of possible donors for programs/projects such as policy and action research, training, and learning materials acquisition or development;
  • Manage funds for region-based projects;
  • Undertake social mobilization and advocacy to ensure success and sustainability of the programs;
  • Provide technical assistance in project development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, social mobilization and advocacy, and such other needs and demands identified by PIUs in the region;
  • Help LGUs resolve problems on project implementation and sourcing of funds; generate, consolidate/prepare a synthesis of feedback that would serve as input to policy directions at the regional level; and
  • Develop a regional database on literacy and continuing education.

National Mechanism: The Literacy Coordinating Council

Pursuant to the overall Literacy Coordinating Council policy along the promotion of stronger partnership and direct access between LCC and LGUs, the LCC assumes overall responsibility for establishing organizational coordination directly with the region, province, and municipality.

  • Regional mechanism – the Regional Literacy Coordinating Council;
  • Provincial mechanism – the Provincial Implementing Unit; and
  • Municipal mechanism – the Municipal Implementing Unit (covering barangay implementing structures and mechanisms).
LCC as overall advisory body

LCC serves as the overall advisory body with the following coordinating functions:

  • Consolidate and analyze programs/projects implemented by PIUs towards the development of policy directions and strategies based on insights gained from the experiences of these PIUs;
  • Review and evaluate progress of programs directly assisted by LCC, tasks of which are conducted in close coordination with concerned RLCC/PIUs;
  • Provide technical assistance to PIUs which seek help from LCC in terms of identifying possible donors/funding agencies and organizations, infrastructure development, research, capability-building, learning materials development, resource acquisition, and other forms of assistance;
  • Formulate various resource generation schemes for project proposals and requesst for assistance of  PIUs in sourcing funds, negotiations, and resource acquisition;
  • Plan and conduct social mobilization and advocacy at the national level to help ensure program awareness and acceptance; and
  • Provide technical guidance in project development and proposal preparations, negotiations with donors and partner agencies, project implementation, monitoring, evaluation, advocacy/social mobilization, institutionalization, and other related forms of assistance as requested by PIUs.